Saturday, April 16, 2011

Abolishing the slave trade

On 22nd May 1787, twelve devout men assembled at a print shop in the City of London. Nine of them were Quakers, the rest Anglicans. Together they formed the Committee for the Abolition of the Slave Trade. Within twenty years of this meeting the slave trade had been abolished in the British Empire. By 1833 parliament had abolished slavery itself in the empire, and all slaves had been freed. By the 1880’s slavery was ended in the southern United States. “From any historical perspective”, writes the historian of slavery, David Bryon-Davis, “This was a stupendous transformation” . [1]

Why did this group of people feel so strongly that slavery ought to be abolished?

To us it is obvious; it seems obscene to ask that question. The problem is that our ability to exercise an historical imagination is poor and we are quick to judge the people of the past by 21st century standards. Christians in the 1700’s were largely complacent about the slave trade. Most felt that, since the Bible did not condemn it directly, and since there were slaves in the Bible, there was no problem. Only a few felt otherwise and they were regarded as the lunatic fringe.

The size of the problem – the Atlantic slave trade

Although it was illegal to own slaves in the British Isles, slaves were central to the economy of Britain in the eighteenth century. Manufactured goods were sent to Africa, traded and exchanged for slaves in the costal areas. The slaves were then taken to the Americas and sold. The money was used to buy raw materials which were then taken to Britain and Europe. It was a profitable cycle of activity and hundreds of ships circled the Atlantic each year.

It is estimated that, in the end, 20 million Africans were taken from their homes and sold into servitude in the Americas. Try to imagine yourself living at this time and accepting this as being perfectly normal. The British economy depends on it and your income is relying on it. If anyone were to abolish the slave trade, thousands of seamen would be thrown out of work. Great cities such as Bristol and Liverpool were thriving because of the buying and selling of living human beings.

Many Christians were slow to see the iniquity of this system. A famous hymn writer will serve as an example.

Image4.jpg John Newton – the Christian slaver who changed his mind slowly

John Newton, born in 1725, was living at sea by the age of eleven! His dad was a sea captain and John Newton followed in his wake, serving in the crew of several slave-ships. During one voyage a violent storm brought Newton to realise the power of God and his own vulnerability. He was dramatically converted in 1748.

But Newton continued to work on slave ships, serving a captain on the Duke of Argyle and The African in 1753 and 1754.

Then Newton left the sea and trained to enter the Anglican ministry. He once wrote, “Only God’s amazing grace could and would take a rude, profane, slave-trading sailor and transform him into a child of God”. Newton’s hymn, Amazing grace is well known but Newton became an abolitionist only gradually – it is an indication of how normal slavery had become that a man like Newton could continue to regard it as acceptable until well into the 1770’s.

But eventually Newton was convinced. In 1787 he wrote Thoughts upon the African Slave Trade, an abolitionist tract based on his experiences as a slave captain. It was an influential work, but even before it was written Newton had already exerted a deep influence upon the abolitionist movement…

Friday, March 11, 2011

Abolition of Slavery

Abolition of Slavery

Slavery has existed all over the world, from Asia, Africa and the Middle East to the Americas. The first movement to abolish the transatlantic slave trade emerged in the British Parliament in the late 1700s. In 1793, Upper Canada, led by Lieutenant Governor John Graves Simcoe, a Loyalist military officer, became the first province in the Empire to move toward abolition.

In 1807, the British Parliament prohibited the buying and selling of slaves, and in 1833 abolished slavery throughout the Empire.

Thousands of slaves escaped from the United States, followed "the North Star" and settled in Canada via the Underground Railroad, a Christian anti-slavery network.

Abolition of Slavery in Thailand

Abolition of Slavery in Thailand

Chulalongkorn in the final act of slavery, the abolition of the credit for two years after his death was not completed. Cancel the law "major" was back.

* U.S. 1863: Emancipation Proclamation declares slaves in the Confederate controlled release "countries limit" Most of the slaves they were free from state action. In Washington, a separate law, the slave releases

* 1912 (Thailand), Siam, officially cancel all slavery. The task of selling a person into slavery was abolished in 1897, but not slavery itself is prohibited.

1921 * slavery ended Nepal [41] [42]
* In Afghanistan in 1923 [43] ending slavery
* 1924 Iraq rejects slavery

It may take a while, you see:

* 1963 United Arab Emirates rejected slavery
* 1970 ended slavery Oman
* 1981 in Mauritania [49] [50] ended in slavery
Australian Aborigines referendum in 1967 allowed members of the population before they count as the "franchise" were they really long for a passport or freedom of movement is not right. They were in fact almost all religious prisoners or government camps reserves.

I probably exceptions for tribal status in Australia through the highlights include notes. Australian government generally is the fact that subhuman natives, these soft white homes as a team and appreciated for the rest of control freedom of movement with no reserves be trained to be placed in leather has been treated as like on paper.

I mention this for balance. Sure we had slavery, but the fact that we had a big part of the population helpless prisoners shows that the dignity of every human life in Australia was a late arrival, and in Thailand than later.


Australia's first Aboriginal world-renowned artists:

Albert Namatjira
The first native to Northern Territory legislation to be released from the boundaries of departments are characterized by the Aborigines of the country.

In 1957, the government's restrictive laws that apply to tribes in the north of the Namatjira and his wife relaxed. This entitled them to vote, own land, a way to build the house to buy alcohol. Albert and Rubina Although legally allowed to drink alcohol was, and his family were not tribal. (Also from Wikipedia)

Namatjira tradition because of the Aborigines, despite the considerable reputation worldwide revenues died a pauper that all personal income is shared with our extended family. Practice remains to this day, a tribal people go to work is the key incentive. What is it? I earn or shared with anyone who is on the Dole.

Or, Namatjira's case:

Because of their wealth, Namatjira soon myself, ritualised form of begging "humbugging" found the subject. Arrernte for everything they own, as well as increased participation are expecting earnings of Namatjira, his extended family was not. Once he was alone at up to six hundred people to offer.

Unfortunately the Australian government do not address this issue. The "culture" so, as part of its tedious demotivating effect is seen despite the attack can be modified or not. Personally, I believe that a key factor to maintain it's aboriginal poor marginalized - some of the worst health and education with the data world.